Agreement Morphology Linguistics

  • Uncategorized

Neidle, Carol. 1982. Case agreement in Russian. In Joan Bresnan (ed.) The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 391-426. Harris, Alice C. 1981 . Agreement N: in the former Georgias. In: Bernard Comrie (.M. note), Studies in the Languages of the UsSR. Edmonston: Language research. [Reprinted 1983 in: Papers in Linguistics 16.121-146.] Tuite, Kevin.

1998. Kartvelian morphosyntax: Number agreement and morphosyntactic orientation in the south caucasian languages. Munich: Lincom Europa. It is important to consider whether the differences between the results observed here for comprehension and those observed by Eberhard (1997) for production are not due to differences in understanding/production, but rather to differences in the syntactic structures used in both studies. We used simple NPs in which quantified expression was the head of the NP; Eberhard used complex NPs in which quantified expression was integrated. Perhaps our positive result for pluralistic quantification effects was a consequence of the relative simplicity of grammatical constructs in our sentences, while Eberhard`s zero results for plural quantification may be due to the coating of the quantified sentence, even if the basic representations or processes that undersiquent to the concordance in understanding and production are isomorphic. However, there is sufficient reason to suspect that this difference in syntactic complexity is not responsible for the understanding/differences in production that we observed. Gelderen, Elly van. 1997. Oral concordance and grammar behind its breakdown: verification of minimalist features (language work 364). Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Theme: The development of the class and contract brand in Kru.

Formal syntactic framework: -Language (s) quoted: Kru Eastern and Western languages Siewierska, Anna. coming. Based on speeches of the marking of the people agreement, In T. Viryanen (note) Speech Approaches to Cognition. Berlin: Gruyter Sheep. Jeffrey G. Heath. Lost wax: brutal replacement of major morphemes in Australian contract complexes. Diachronica 14. 2. 197-232.

The grammar agreement is an integral part of the morphosyntax of many languages, including English, and must therefore be treated routinely during the use of the language. For example, the production of well-formed sentences in English requires locotors to calculate the dependencies between discontinuous elements (z.B. of a set of subject-name [NP] and verb), sometimes at great distances. Psycho-psycho-psycholine behavioural research from linguistic production has repeatedly shown that this process can be error-prone (z.B. Bock-Miller, 1991; Brehm and Bock, 2013; Dust, 2009). What is important is that this line of research has also shown that the study of factors that influence error rates can provide a clear window into the cognitive mechanisms that support the calculation of grammatical relationships, as well as the extent and role of linguistic indications that influence how we calculate discontinuous correspondences and dependencies in language in general.

Close Menu