There has long been a position that the granting of a land acquisition option (an appeal option) is itself the granting of a share of land and is therefore generally exempt from VAT, unless the lender has opted for the taxation of the property. The same treatment applies to put options and the abandonment of options. If interest in the land did not fall under the exemption, so it would be assessed by default, an option to acquire such a shareholding would also be assessed by default. There are a few exceptions, for example.B. commercial real estate less than three years old is rated by default (20%). However, an owner may decide to waive the VAT exemption in the event of the purchase of a commercial property and to collect VAT on a property. This is called a “tax option.” The exercise of the option is a long-term obligation, as the option cannot be revoked for 20 years once it is exercised. The pros and cons must be carefully considered. Whichever agreement is chosen, a landowner should be advised and carefully considered the tax situation. If a promotion contract is chosen, there are two immediate concerns.
First, that the developer is required to collect VAT on all payments it receives (i.e., reimbursement of its transportation and development costs and its percentage share of the proceeds of the resulting net sale); second, landowners and developers run the risk of being treated in partnership and taxed as such. The most commonly recognized advantage of a transportation agreement is that the interests of landowners and contractors are closely intertwined, to the extent that it is in the interests of both parties to obtain the highest possible price on the open market. From a developer`s perspective, promotion agreements also have the advantage that the developer will never own the property and tax, practices and other considerations that this implies. Under this agreement, a developer assumes responsibility for securing the building permit and also has the option to purchase the land at a given point (usually once the planning is complete). The purchase of the developer is made at an agreed price that generally reflects the market value of the land, net of compensation for the guarantee of the building permit and perhaps instead of a levy that would otherwise have been levied. Options are usually time sensitive and a fee can be paid to back up the option, as well as extend it if necessary. It is only to make the conclusion even more difficult that hybrid agreements exist; an option agreement allowing the developer to market the land for sale to a third party (i.e. effectively converting it into a transportation contract) or a transportation contract allowing the developer (or a related company) to purchase the land from the market. However, option agreements often offer developers a simpler and more connected method to the power line to participate in a website, and there are a number of reasons for this calculation: the same principle applies to options, to buy leases or rights on land or land occupancy licenses.
Responsibility for granting the option is independent of the responsibility for the financial assistance to be acquired, etc. on that date. In general, the interests of the landowner and the developer under an aid contract are more consistent with the intent to maximize value than in an option agreement in which the developer wishes to acquire the land for as few as possible. Nevertheless, conflicting interests remain between a landowner and a developer with respect to the costs incurred by the developer in issuing the building permit and, to a lesser extent, the speed with which the land is sold after obtaining the building permit.